Goldsmith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Goldsmith v. State

1919 OK CR 117, 179 P. 623, 15 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 88

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 17, 1919·No. No. A-3361.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, E. G. Goldsmith, was convicted in the district court of Garfield county of keeping a place in the city of Enid, known as the “Eagle Hall,” wifh the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of $250. To reverse the-judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 16, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution -is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, E. G. Goldsmith, was convicted in the district court of Garfield county of keeping a place in the city of Enid, known as the “Eagle Hall,” wifh the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of $250. To reverse the-judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 16, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.

In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution -is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.

Goldsmith v. State, 1919 OK CR 117, 179 P. 623, 15 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 88 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

1919 OK CR 117 (Goldsmith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related