Goldsmith v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 117 (Goldsmith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, E. G. Goldsmith, was convicted in the district court of Garfield county of keeping a place in the city of Enid, known as the “Eagle Hall,” wifh the felonious intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days and a fine of $250. To reverse the-judgment an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on May 16, 1918, a petition in error with case-made.
In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution -is based was held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 117, 179 P. 623, 15 Okla. Crim. 693, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.