Goldsmith v. State

218 So. 2d 193
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 1969·No. No. K-280·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Marti v. State, 163 So.2d 506 (Fla.App.3d, 1964); Austin v. State, 160 So.2d 730 (Fla.App.2d, 1964).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldsmith v. State, 218 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

218 So. 2d 193 (Goldsmith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marti v. State
163 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Austin v. State
160 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)