Goldsmith v. Southwestern Railroad

62 Ga. 495
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 Ga. 495 (Goldsmith v. Southwestern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldsmith v. Southwestern Railroad, 62 Ga. 495 (Ga. 1879).

Opinions

Jackson, Justice.

The record in this case as in that of the The State vs. The Augusta and Savannah Railroad Company, and The State vs. The Georgia Railroad and Banking Company, and The State vs. The Central Railroad and Banking Company, shows no such returns made by this company for the years 1876 and 1877 as entitles the company to the remedy by affidavit of illegality in Fulton superior court. Those returns are required by the act of 1871, and modifications thereof in subsequent acts, as conditions precedent in order to entitle the company to this remedy. The affidavit of illegality should, therefore, have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the court to try it. The facts of the case are [501]*501so complicated that more adequate relief can be afforded in equity, and that would seem to be the better forum independently of the question of jurisdiction. '

Judgment reversed.

Bleckley, Justice, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Wright
206 F. 107 (N.D. Georgia, 1913)
State v. Southwestern Railroad
70 Ga. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ga. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-southwestern-railroad-ga-1879.