Goldsmith v. Southwestern Railroad
This text of 62 Ga. 495 (Goldsmith v. Southwestern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The record in this case as in that of the The State vs. The Augusta and Savannah Railroad Company, and The State vs. The Georgia Railroad and Banking Company, and The State vs. The Central Railroad and Banking Company, shows no such returns made by this company for the years 1876 and 1877 as entitles the company to the remedy by affidavit of illegality in Fulton superior court. Those returns are required by the act of 1871, and modifications thereof in subsequent acts, as conditions precedent in order to entitle the company to this remedy. The affidavit of illegality should, therefore, have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction in the court to try it. The facts of the case are [501]*501so complicated that more adequate relief can be afforded in equity, and that would seem to be the better forum independently of the question of jurisdiction. '
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Ga. 495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-southwestern-railroad-ga-1879.