Goldsmith v. Sachs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldsmith v. Sachs

30 Misc. 767, 61 N.Y.S. 1137

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 767 (Goldsmith v. Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldsmith v. Sachs, 30 Misc. 767, 61 N.Y.S. 1137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The disputed questions of fact whether the note was transferred to the plaintiff before or after maturity and whether any consideration passed between the original parties, were resolved against the plaintiff, and the record presents nothing for our consideration warranting interference with the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The disputed questions of fact whether the note was transferred to the plaintiff before or after maturity and whether any consideration passed between the original parties, were resolved against the plaintiff, and the record presents nothing for our consideration warranting interference with the judgment.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondent.

Present: Freedman, P. J.; MacLean and Leventritt, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 767, 61 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-sachs-nyappterm-1899.