Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
This text of 120 A.D. 886 (Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order setting aside verdict' and granting new trial modified by striking out the provision, for costs to abide the event, and substituting a iirovision requiring the defendant to pay the'costs of the trial already had' and all' disbursements to dat.e;. together with the costs of this appeal, all to be paid witiiin twenty days; otherwise order reversed and judgment unanimously directed on the verdict, with costs and costs of this appeal, (See Helgers v. Staten Island Midland R. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 570.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred. - 1 . ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappdiv-1907.