Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

120 A.D. 886

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Order setting aside verdict' and granting new trial modified by striking out the provision, for costs to abide the event, and substituting a iirovision requiring the defendant to pay the'costs of the trial already had' and all' disbursements to dat.e;. together with the costs of this appeal, all to be paid witiiin twenty days; otherwise order reversed and judgment unanimously directed on the verdict, with costs and costs of this appeal, (See Helgers v. Staten Island Midland R. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 570.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred. - 1 . ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside verdict' and granting new trial modified by striking out the provision, for costs to abide the event, and substituting a iirovision requiring the defendant to pay the'costs of the trial already had' and all' disbursements to dat.e;. together with the costs of this appeal, all to be paid witiiin twenty days; otherwise order reversed and judgment unanimously directed on the verdict, with costs and costs of this appeal, (See Helgers v. Staten Island Midland R. R. Co., 69 App. Div. 570.) Hirschberg, P. J., Woodward, Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred. - 1 . ,

Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 120 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

120 A.D. 886 (Goldsmith v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related