Goldsmith v. Goldsmith
45 A.D.2d 756, 357 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4643
Opinion
Order of thq Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 4, 1974, affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements to respondents jointly, without prejudice to any proper proceeding • that may hereafter be brought on behalf of the infant Shawna; Goldsmith against her grandfather Jesse Ross foi; support (Lawrence v. Fox 20 N. Y. 268), provided support moneys from either appellant or respondent Janet S. Goldsmith become unavailable in the future. Hopkins; Acting P. J., Shapiro, Cohalan, Christ and Benjamin, JJ,, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 45 A.D.2d 756, 357 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).
45 A.D.2d 756 (Goldsmith v. Goldsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawrence v. . Fox
20 N.Y. 268 (New York Court of Appeals, 1859)