Goldsmith v. Devito
609 So. 2d 785, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13695, 1992 WL 386383
This text of 609 So. 2d 785 (Goldsmith v. Devito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldsmith v. Devito, 609 So. 2d 785, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13695, 1992 WL 386383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
David A. Goldsmith appeals a summary final judgment entered in an action on a promissory note. We reverse the summary judgment because the plaintiff, Nick De-vito, did not file sufficient affidavits to establish his claim or to overcome Goldsmith’s affirmative defenses.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
609 So. 2d 785, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13695, 1992 WL 386383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldsmith-v-devito-fladistctapp-1992.