Goldsmith v. . Baldwin

134 N.E. 594, 232 N.Y. 614, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1202
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 1922·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Not voting: Cardozo, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldsmith v. . Baldwin, 134 N.E. 594, 232 N.Y. 614, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1202 (N.Y. 1922).

134 N.E. 594 (Goldsmith v. . Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.