Goldshein v. D'Angelo

New York Court of Appeals

Goldshein v. D'Angelo

261 N.E.2d 908, 27 N.Y.2d 658, 313 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1201

DecidedJune 16, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.E.2d 908 (Goldshein v. D'Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldshein v. D'Angelo, 261 N.E.2d 908, 27 N.Y.2d 658, 313 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1201 (N.Y. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: We agree with the dissenters at the Appellate Division that there was insufficient evidence to support a determination that respondents McInerney, Delloso and Sedano were “not in sympathy with the principles of [the Republican] party” (Election Law, § 332, subd. 2). The proof that they were aided in their candidacies by members and leaders of the Conservative Party in the circulation of their petitions and otherwise falls far short of establishing petitioners’ claim. The order should be modified by reversing as to said respondents and dismissing the petition as to them.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed: We agree with the dissenters at the Appellate Division that there was insufficient evidence to support a determination that respondents McInerney, Delloso and Sedano were “not in sympathy with the principles of [the Republican] party” (Election Law, § 332, subd. 2). The proof that they were aided in their candidacies by members and leaders of the Conservative Party in the circulation of their petitions and otherwise falls far short of establishing petitioners’ claim. The order should be modified by reversing as to said respondents and dismissing the petition as to them.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.E.2d 908, 27 N.Y.2d 658, 313 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldshein-v-dangelo-ny-1970.