Goldschmidt v. Rudin
233 A.D. 740
Opinion
Order and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs to abide the event, and motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges that the condition precedent with respect to the passing of title did not occur as a consequence of a fault of the defendant in refusing to make the conveyance. The applicability of Levy v. Forster (224 App. Div. 463) can be determined only upon the trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldschmidt v. Rudin, 233 A.D. 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
233 A.D. 740 (Goldschmidt v. Rudin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levy v. Forster
224 A.D. 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)