Goldschmidt v. Rudin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldschmidt v. Rudin

233 A.D. 740

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 740 (Goldschmidt v. Rudin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldschmidt v. Rudin, 233 A.D. 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs to abide the event, and motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges that the condition precedent with respect to the passing of title did not occur as a consequence of a fault of the defendant in refusing to make the conveyance. The applicability of Levy v. Forster (224 App. Div. 463) can be determined only upon the trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs to abide the event, and motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. The complaint sufficiently alleges that the condition precedent with respect to the passing of title did not occur as a consequence of a fault of the defendant in refusing to make the conveyance. The applicability of Levy v. Forster (224 App. Div. 463) can be determined only upon the trial. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldschmidt-v-rudin-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack