Goldsberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Goldsberry v. State

504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894725, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 502

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 17, 2016·No. No. ED 103073·Published

Opinion

[68] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jody Goldsberry (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty to driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, pursuant to Section 577.010, RSMo (Cum Supp. 2010) and Section 577.023, RSMo (Cum Supp. 2012). Movant was sentenced to five years in prison. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[68] ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jody Goldsberry (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty to driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, pursuant to Section 577.010, RSMo (Cum Supp. 2010) and Section 577.023, RSMo (Cum Supp. 2012). Movant was sentenced to five years in prison. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Goldsberry v. State, 504 S.W.3d 67, 2016 WL 2894725, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 502 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

504 S.W.3d 67 (Goldsberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.