Goldreyer v. Shalita
152 N.Y.S. 1002
This text of 152 N.Y.S. 1002 (Goldreyer v. Shalita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldreyer v. Shalita, 152 N.Y.S. 1002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs, in view of the fact.that respondent’s brief is printed in form violating rule 43 of the General Rules of Practice, made applicable by rule 4 of the Calendar Rules of this court, and particularly because on page 43 of respondent’s brief appears a gratuitous, improper, and immaterial reflection upon appellant’s attorney.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 N.Y.S. 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldreyer-v-shalita-nyappterm-1915.