Goldner v. Mencher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldner v. Mencher

276 A.D.2d 760

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 760 (Goldner v. Mencher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldner v. Mencher, 276 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse, with leave to serve an amended complaint on the ground that, in its present form, the complaint is insufficient in law. A few general, eonelusory statements are insufficient to form the basis of a charge of conspiracy to destroy the business of the plaintiffs without lawful justification. [See post, p. 893.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to reverse, with leave to serve an amended complaint on the ground that, in its present form, the complaint is insufficient in law. A few general, eonelusory statements are insufficient to form the basis of a charge of conspiracy to destroy the business of the plaintiffs without lawful justification. [See post, p. 893.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldner-v-mencher-nyappdiv-1949.