Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

254 A.D. 658, 4 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified by reversing so much thereof as adjudges that defendant Knickerbocker Ice Company have judgment against plaintiffs, and by providing that plaintiffs have judgment against the defendants as stated in order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff s-appellants against defendants. The judgment in so far as it is against the Knickerbocker Ice Company is on the ground that defendant Thomas Brennan was acting within the scope of his employment. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously modified by reversing so much thereof as adjudges that defendant Knickerbocker Ice Company have judgment against plaintiffs, and by providing that plaintiffs have judgment against the defendants as stated in order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff s-appellants against defendants. The judgment in so far as it is against the Knickerbocker Ice Company is on the ground that defendant Thomas Brennan was acting within the scope of his employment. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 254 A.D. 658, 4 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 658 (Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.