Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

254 A.D. 658, 4 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957

This text of 254 A.D. 658 (Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldner v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 254 A.D. 658, 4 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified by reversing so much thereof as adjudges that defendant Knickerbocker Ice Company have judgment against plaintiffs, and by providing that plaintiffs have judgment against the defendants as stated in order, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to plaintiff s-appellants against defendants. The judgment in so far as it is against the Knickerbocker Ice Company is on the ground that defendant Thomas Brennan was acting within the scope of his employment. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 658, 4 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldner-v-knickerbocker-ice-co-nyappdiv-1938.