Goldmark v. Roseneeld
This text of 34 N.W. 228 (Goldmark v. Roseneeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order for judgment dismissing the action with costs, made by the county court February 26, 1887. The order also strikes from the files an amended complaint, and dissolves two injunctional orders granted in the action by a court commissioner. Judgment was regularly entered pursuant to the order, on March 22, 1887, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, and for costs. This appeal was taken March 28th. It is therefore too late. No appeal lies after judgment from an interlocutory order reviewable on an appeal from the judgment. Victor S. M. Co. v. Heller, 41 Wis. 657; Thornton v. Eaton, 45 Wis. 621. This order is so reviewable. R. S. sec. 3070.
The appeal must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 N.W. 228, 69 Wis. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldmark-v-roseneeld-wis-1887.