Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Goldman v. State

Goldman v. State

8 So. 3d 473, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 2009 WL 1066108
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2009·No. No. 3D09-635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); see also State v. Rodriguez, 990 So.2d 600, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“[Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. State, 8 So. 3d 473, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 2009 WL 1066108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

8 So. 3d 473 (Goldman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rodriguez
990 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)