Goldman v. State
8 So. 3d 473, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 2009 WL 1066108
This text of 8 So. 3d 473 (Goldman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldman v. State, 8 So. 3d 473, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 2009 WL 1066108 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b); see also State v. Rodriguez, 990 So.2d 600, 607 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“[Neither the trial court nor counsel is required to forewarn a defendant about every conceivable collateral consequence of a plea to criminal charges.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Rodriguez
990 So. 2d 600 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 So. 3d 473, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3410, 2009 WL 1066108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.