Goldman v. Segal

278 A.D.2d 74, 718 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13083
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 74 (Goldman v. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldman v. Segal, 278 A.D.2d 74, 718 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 30, 1999, inter alia, awarding plaintiffs use and occupancy against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[75]*75Plaintiffs are entitled to use and occupancy for the entire period that no rent was demanded or paid. Although defendants had occupied the apartment for several years before plaintiffs finally realized that they were not billing defendants and demanded payment of rent, the record amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs did not waive payment of rent (see, Jefpaul Garage Corp. v Presbyterian Hosp., 61 NY2d 442, 446). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thor 560 W. 136th St., LLC v. Sanghvi
2024 NY Slip Op 34474(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
425 Third Avenue Realty Co. v. Greenfield
78 A.D.3d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Levinson v. 390 West End Associates, L.L.C.
22 A.D.3d 397 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 74, 718 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-segal-nyappdiv-2000.