Goldman v. Segal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Segal

278 A.D.2d 74, 718 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13083

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 2000·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 30, 1999, inter alia, awarding plaintiffs use and occupancy against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[75] Plaintiffs are entitled to use and occupancy for the entire period that no rent was demanded or paid. Although defendants had occupied the apartment for several years before plaintiffs finally realized that they were not billing defendants and demanded payment of rent, the record amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs did not waive payment of rent (see, Jefpaul Garage Corp. v Presbyterian Hosp., 61 NY2d 442, 446). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered December 30, 1999, inter alia, awarding plaintiffs use and occupancy against defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[75] Plaintiffs are entitled to use and occupancy for the entire period that no rent was demanded or paid. Although defendants had occupied the apartment for several years before plaintiffs finally realized that they were not billing defendants and demanded payment of rent, the record amply supports the trial court’s finding that plaintiffs did not waive payment of rent (see, Jefpaul Garage Corp. v Presbyterian Hosp., 61 NY2d 442, 446). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Williams, Ellerin and Andrias, JJ.

Goldman v. Segal, 278 A.D.2d 74, 718 N.Y.S.2d 34, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 74 (Goldman v. Segal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related