Goldman v. Rubinstein

214 A.D. 791
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 214 A.D. 791 (Goldman v. Rubinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldman v. Rubinstein, 214 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Orders and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and motion of plaintiff for judg[792]*792ment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs; the motion of defendant for judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant. The prior action in the Municipal Court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff (appellant), and affirmed by the Appellate Term, was res adjudicata of the cause of action set forth in the complaint in this action, against the same party to that action, and is final and conclusive between the parties. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Pleasant Valley Finishing Co., Inc.
756 F. Supp. 725 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Warshor v. Warshor
130 Misc. 262 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 A.D. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-rubinstein-nyappdiv-1925.