Goldman v. Rubinstein

214 A.D. 791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Orders and judgment reversed upon the law, with costs, and motion of plaintiff for judg[792]*792ment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs; the motion of defendant for judgment dismissing the complaint is granted, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant. The prior action in the Municipal Court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff (appellant), and affirmed by the Appellate Term, was res adjudicata of the cause of action set forth in the complaint in this action, against the same party to that action, and is final and conclusive between the parties. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Rubinstein, 214 A.D. 791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

214 A.D. 791 (Goldman v. Rubinstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. Pleasant Valley Finishing Co., Inc.
756 F. Supp. 725 (S.D. New York, 1990)
Warshor v. Warshor
130 Misc. 262 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)