Goldman v. Rocca

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Rocca

86 N.Y.S. 1136

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 1136 (Goldman v. Rocca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Rocca, 86 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinions

DAVIS, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant to recover damages for defendant’s neglect of duty as a marshal in failing to properly levy and collect under an execution issued to him in an action in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, First judicial district. The judgment was rendered, after hearing, on conflicting testimony as to matters of fact, and there appears no good reason upon the record to reverse it. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

FREEDMAN, P. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant to recover damages for defendant’s neglect of duty as a marshal in failing to properly levy and collect under an execution issued to him in an action in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, First judicial district. The judgment was rendered, after hearing, on conflicting testimony as to matters of fact, and there appears no good reason upon the record to reverse it. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

FREEDMAN, P. J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-rocca-nyappterm-1904.