Goldman v. Page

Mississippi Supreme Court

Goldman v. Page

59 Miss. 404

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 Miss. 404 (Goldman v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Page, 59 Miss. 404 (Mich. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The loss of the bond gave the Chancery Court jurisdiction. Truly v. Lane, 7 S. & M. 325; New Orleans Railroad Co. v. Mississippi College, 47 Miss. 560.

The suit was properly brought by the complainants, who, with one of the defendants, are the board of directors of the association, and as such represent the rights and interests of all. Wall v. Boisgerard, 11 S. & M. 574; Story Eq. PL § 107.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The loss of the bond gave the Chancery Court jurisdiction. Truly v. Lane, 7 S. & M. 325; New Orleans Railroad Co. v. Mississippi College, 47 Miss. 560.

The suit was properly brought by the complainants, who, with one of the defendants, are the board of directors of the association, and as such represent the rights and interests of all. Wall v. Boisgerard, 11 S. & M. 574; Story Eq. PL § 107.

Decree reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Miss. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-page-miss-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack