Goldman v. Keystone Bloomer Co.
246 A.D. 832
Opinion
In an action by a salesman to recover an amount alleged to be due under a [833]*833written contract of employment, order precluding the plaintiff from offering, on the trial, any evidence with reference to the orders and reorders set forth in paragraphs numbered third and fifth in his bill of particulars, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldman v. Keystone Bloomer Co., 246 A.D. 832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
246 A.D. 832 (Goldman v. Keystone Bloomer Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.