Goldman v. Jacobs

38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 15, 1902·Published

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment by default, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for goods sold and delivered. On the return day of the summons, the defendant moved to transfer the cause on the ground that none of the parties resided in the second district. The evidence in the record to such effect was not contradicted. It was, therefore, the duty of the justice to make the transfer (Greater N. Y. Charter, § 1370, subd. 4), and for his failure therein the remedy of the defendant properly lies in this appeal (People ex rel. Jaffe v. Bolte, 35 Misc. Rep. 53), and the justice being without authority to render judgment (Consol. Act, § 1382; McKee v. Oliver, 2 Daly, 381; Barrowcliffe v. Harrison, 9 id. 473), it must be reversed.

Freedman, P. J., and Gildebsleeve, J., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Jacobs, 38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

38 Misc. 781 (Goldman v. Jacobs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Jaffe v. Bolte
35 Misc. 53 (New York Supreme Court, 1901)
McKee v. Oliver
2 Daly 381 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1868)