Goldman v. Jacobs

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Jacobs

38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Misc. 781 (Goldman v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Jacobs, 38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment by default, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for goods sold and delivered. On the return day of the summons, the defendant moved to transfer the cause on the ground that none of the parties resided in the second district. The evidence in the record to such effect was not contradicted. It was, therefore, the duty of the justice to make the transfer (Greater N. Y. Charter, § 1370, subd. 4), and for his failure therein the remedy of the defendant properly lies in this appeal (People ex rel. Jaffe v. Bolte, 35 Misc. Rep. 53), and the justice being without authority to render judgment (Consol. Act, § 1382; McKee v. Oliver, 2 Daly, 381; Barrowcliffe v. Harrison, 9 id. 473), it must be reversed.

Freedman, P. J., and Gildebsleeve, J., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLean, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment by default, rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for goods sold and delivered. On the return day of the summons, the defendant moved to transfer the cause on the ground that none of the parties resided in the second district. The evidence in the record to such effect was not contradicted. It was, therefore, the duty of the justice to make the transfer (Greater N. Y. Charter, § 1370, subd. 4), and for his failure therein the remedy of the defendant properly lies in this appeal (People ex rel. Jaffe v. Bolte, 35 Misc. Rep. 53), and the justice being without authority to render judgment (Consol. Act, § 1382; McKee v. Oliver, 2 Daly, 381; Barrowcliffe v. Harrison, 9 id. 473), it must be reversed.

Freedman, P. J., and Gildebsleeve, J., concur.

Judgment reversed, with costs to appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Misc. 781, 78 N.Y.S. 833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-jacobs-nyappterm-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack