Goldman v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Goldman v. Gordon

135 S.W.2d 1024

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 17, 1940

DocketNo. 10653.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.W.2d 1024 (Goldman v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Gordon, 135 S.W.2d 1024 (Tex. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the County Court of Victoria County sustaining the plea of privilege of appellee, J. A. Gordon. The appellant, Henry Goldman, has filed no brief in this Court, and the case was submitted on the brief of the appellee. We have inspected the record for fundamental error. McGraw v. Albracht, Tex.Civ.App., 16 S.W.2d 1112.

Concluding that there is no fundamental error in the case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the County Court of Victoria County sustaining the plea of privilege of appellee, J. A. Gordon. The appellant, Henry Goldman, has filed no brief in this Court, and the case was submitted on the brief of the appellee. We have inspected the record for fundamental error. McGraw v. Albracht, Tex.Civ.App., 16 S.W.2d 1112.

Concluding that there is no fundamental error in the case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.W.2d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-gordon-texapp-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack