Goldman v. Goldman
150 A.D.2d 269, 543 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825
Opinion
Motion deemed as one seeking reargument, which motion is granted and, upon reargument, the order of this court (144 AD2d 313) entered on November 29, 1988 and the accompanying memorandum decision filed therewith are recalled and vacated, and a new order and memorandum decision substituted therefor. (See, Matter of Goldman, Í 50 AD2d 267 [decided herewith].) Concur—Carro, J. P., Asch, Milonas and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldman v. Goldman, 150 A.D.2d 269, 543 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
150 A.D.2d 269 (Goldman v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York
50 A.D.2d 265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
In re the Estate of Goldman
144 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)