Goldman v. Goldman

311 So. 2d 201, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldman v. Goldman. Read the opinion of the Court — 333 So. 2d 120
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 1975·No. No. 74-1121·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Arrington v. Arrington, Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 473; Preston v. Preston, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 31; Thigpen v. Thigpen, Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 583; Schwartz v. Schwartz, Fla.App.1974, 297 So.2d 117; Kennedy v. Kennedy, Fla.1974, 303 So.2d 629.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Goldman, 311 So. 2d 201, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13903 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

311 So. 2d 201 (Goldman v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. Schwartz
297 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Preston v. Preston
216 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Kennedy v. Kennedy
303 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
Thigpen v. Thigpen
277 So. 2d 583 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Arrington v. Arrington
150 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)