Goldman v. County of Rockland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. County of Rockland

74 A.D.2d 596, 424 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 596 (Goldman v. County of Rockland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. County of Rockland, 74 A.D.2d 596, 424 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the County of Rockland, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered June 7, 1979, which denied the application. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. The record indicates that appellant failed to provide an explanation sufficient to justify excusing the untimely service of the notice of claim. Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim against the County of Rockland, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered June 7, 1979, which denied the application. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term properly exercised its discretion in denying appellant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. The record indicates that appellant failed to provide an explanation sufficient to justify excusing the untimely service of the notice of claim. Mollen, P. J., Cohalan, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 596, 424 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-county-of-rockland-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack