Goldman v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.

285 A.D. 880, 137 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5968
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1955·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion to strike paragraphs 3d, 4th and 8th of the complaint is granted. The measure of damages in a suit for breach of a contract of employment is the amount plaintiff employee would have earned had the contract been performed, less what the employee, acting reasonably, could have earned {Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362). Allegations set forth in the challenged paragraphs which seek the recovery of damages in excess of this amount are irrelevant and prejudicial. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. City Specialty Stores, Inc., 285 A.D. 880, 137 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 880 (Goldman v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mink Hollow Development Corp. v. State
87 Misc. 2d 61 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)
Amaducci v. Metropolitan Opera Ass'n
33 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.
24 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Cornell v. T. V. Development Corp.
41 Misc. 2d 628 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)