Goldman v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.
This text of 285 A.D. 880 (Goldman v. City Specialty Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion to strike paragraphs 3d, 4th and 8th of the complaint is granted. The measure of damages in a suit for breach of a contract of employment is the amount plaintiff employee would have earned had the contract been performed, less what the employee, acting reasonably, could have earned {Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362). Allegations set forth in the challenged paragraphs which seek the recovery of damages in excess of this amount are irrelevant and prejudicial. Settle order. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D. 880, 137 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-city-specialty-stores-inc-nyappdiv-1955.