Goldman v. City of New York
264 A.D. 740, 34 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4453
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 1942·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
In this action by plaintiff wife to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell upon a snow- and ice-covered sidewalk thirty-six and one-half hours after the cessation of a two-day snow storm, and by plaintiff husband for medical expenses and loss of services, no actionable negligence on the part of appellant was shown. Judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and the complaint dismissed on the law, with costs. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldman v. City of New York, 264 A.D. 740, 34 N.Y.S.2d 428, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).
264 A.D. 740 (Goldman v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valentine v. City of New York
86 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Amelchenko v. Borough of Freehold
201 A.2d 726 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964)