Goldman v. Business Factors Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Goldman v. Business Factors Corp.

207 N.E.2d 603, 15 N.Y.2d 983, 260 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1452

DecidedApril 15, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.E.2d 603 (Goldman v. Business Factors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Business Factors Corp., 207 N.E.2d 603, 15 N.Y.2d 983, 260 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1452 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Eejecting the contention made by plaintiff as cross-appellant we hold that the judgment below would not be res judicata against defendant in a separate suit to recover for alleged fraud and that the Appellate Division, therefore, acted within its powers in giving defendant permission to bring an independent action based on said alleged fraud.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs. Eejecting the contention made by plaintiff as cross-appellant we hold that the judgment below would not be res judicata against defendant in a separate suit to recover for alleged fraud and that the Appellate Division, therefore, acted within its powers in giving defendant permission to bring an independent action based on said alleged fraud.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 N.E.2d 603, 15 N.Y.2d 983, 260 N.Y.S.2d 5, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-business-factors-corp-ny-1965.