Goldman v. Azar
This text of Goldman v. Azar (Goldman v. Azar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 23, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION
RANDALL GOLDMAN, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-463 § § ALEX AZAR, §
§ Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 55) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on June 25, 2021, regarding Instrument Nos. 31, 35 and 44. Plaintiff timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (5th Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. SIGNED on this the _2_3_r_d day of August, 2021, at Houston, Texas.
VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goldman v. Azar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-azar-txsd-2021.