Goldman v. Azar

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT August 23, 2021 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION

RANDALL GOLDMAN, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:20-CV-463 § § ALEX AZAR, §

§ Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 55) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on June 25, 2021, regarding Instrument Nos. 31, 35 and 44. Plaintiff timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (5th Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. SIGNED on this the _2_3_r_d day of August, 2021, at Houston, Texas.

VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE