Goldman v. Armstrong

243 A.D. 548

Opinion

Order denying motion for a peremptory mandamus order requiring defendant to revoke a permit and enforce certain zoning law regulations in the city of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Present — Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman v. Armstrong, 243 A.D. 548 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

243 A.D. 548 (Goldman v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.