Goldman v. Allstate Insurance
This text of 204 A.D.2d 273 (Goldman v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover the proceeds of an insurance policy, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), entered July 16, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion for leave to serve a late answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing the plaintiffs to accept the defendant’s late answer (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Murphy v D. V. Waste Control Corp., 124 AD2d 573; Smithtown Gen. Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., Ill AD2d 382; Buderwitz v Cunningham, 101 AD2d 821; Le Cesse v Giancursio, 38 AD2d 873). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 273, 614 N.Y.S.2d 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.