Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour

96 N.Y.S. 335

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 96 N.Y.S. 335 (Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour, 96 N.Y.S. 335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order staying execution, and by another appeal by defendant at this term of the court from an order-refusing to vacate the judgment that judgment may be affected; and although it does not appear that the final judgment has been directly appealed from, it may be so far considered as to justify the stay heretofore granted.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order staying execution, and by another appeal by defendant at this term of the court from an order-refusing to vacate the judgment that judgment may be affected; and although it does not appear that the final judgment has been directly appealed from, it may be so far considered as to justify the stay heretofore granted.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 N.Y.S. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-v-abd-el-nour-nyappterm-1905.