Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour

96 N.Y.S. 335

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 24, 1905·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order staying execution, and by another appeal by defendant at this term of the court from an order-refusing to vacate the judgment that judgment may be affected; and although it does not appear that the final judgment has been directly appealed from, it may be so far considered as to justify the stay heretofore granted.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order staying execution, and by another appeal by defendant at this term of the court from an order-refusing to vacate the judgment that judgment may be affected; and although it does not appear that the final judgment has been directly appealed from, it may be so far considered as to justify the stay heretofore granted.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour, 96 N.Y.S. 335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

96 N.Y.S. 335 (Goldman v. Abd-El-Nour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.