Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner

611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1993·No. No. 92-0790·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with the appellants that the trial court had continuing jurisdiction to consider their claim for fees, even after the parties had agreed to voluntarily terminate the dissolution proceedings. See Irwin v. Marko, 408 So.2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA1981), rev. denied sub nom. Marko v. Walden & Walden, 419 So.2d 1198 (Fla.1982).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions that an evidentiary hearing be conducted on appellants' claim.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner, 611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

611 So. 2d 629 (Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leibowitz v. Leibowitz
611 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)