Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner

611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1993
DocketNo. 92-0790
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 611 So. 2d 629 (Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner, 611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. We agree with the appellants that the trial court had continuing jurisdiction to consider their claim for fees, even after the parties had agreed to voluntarily terminate the dissolution proceedings. See Irwin v. Marko, 408 So.2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA1981), rev. denied sub nom. Marko v. Walden & Walden, 419 So.2d 1198 (Fla.1982).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions that an evidentiary hearing be conducted on appellants' claim.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leibowitz v. Leibowitz
611 So. 2d 629 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-link-pa-v-kerner-fladistctapp-1993.