Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner
This text of 611 So. 2d 629 (Goldman-Link, P.A. v. Kerner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
REVERSED. We agree with the appellants that the trial court had continuing jurisdiction to consider their claim for fees, even after the parties had agreed to voluntarily terminate the dissolution proceedings. See Irwin v. Marko, 408 So.2d 677 (Fla. 4th DCA1981), rev. denied sub nom. Marko v. Walden & Walden, 419 So.2d 1198 (Fla.1982).
Accordingly, we reverse with directions that an evidentiary hearing be conducted on appellants' claim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
611 So. 2d 629, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1415, 1993 WL 20434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-link-pa-v-kerner-fladistctapp-1993.