Goldman (Jonathan) Vs. State
This text of Goldman (Jonathan) Vs. State (Goldman (Jonathan) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JONATHAN GOLDMAN, No. 79330 Appellant, vs. FIL 4° :FP 4 THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
EL ŠRC:V/N CLE REME COURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY OEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge. This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court entered the judgment of conviction on March 19, 2019, Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until July 30, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lazada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
J.
61111\541"7 ,J Parraguirre Cadish cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Jonathan Goldman Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
2 Pi 1.1.11
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goldman (Jonathan) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-jonathan-vs-state-nev-2019.