Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C. v. Filippatos

52 A.D.3d 397, 861 N.Y.S.2d 312
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 A.D.3d 397 (Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C. v. Filippatos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldman & Greenbaum, P.C. v. Filippatos, 52 A.D.3d 397, 861 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 25, 2007, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, referring the matter of damages and costs to a Special Referee to hear and report, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The Fee Dispute Resolution Program has no applicability where the amount in dispute exceeds $50,000 (see 22 NYCRR 137.1 [b] [2]); both parties agree that the amount in dispute substantially exceeds that amount. Plaintiff contends that since it rescinded the tentative credit of $50,000, the amount owed by defendant client is approximately $140,000. Defendant admits he paid only $114,000 of the approximately $250,000 billed in attorney’s fees. The amount in dispute clearly exceeds the $50,000 cap.

Plaintiff law firm did not consent to arbitration (22 NYCRR 137.2). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether defen[398]*398dant waived his right to arbitration. Concur—Lippman, PJ., Tom, Gonzalez, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.3d 397, 861 N.Y.S.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-greenbaum-pc-v-filippatos-nyappdiv-2008.