Goldman Copeland Associates v. Goodstein Bros. & Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Goldman Copeland Associates v. Goodstein Bros. & Co.

750 N.E.2d 74, 96 N.Y.2d 796, 726 N.Y.S.2d 372, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 966

DecidedApril 26, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 750 N.E.2d 74 (Goldman Copeland Associates v. Goodstein Bros. & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldman Copeland Associates v. Goodstein Bros. & Co., 750 N.E.2d 74, 96 N.Y.2d 796, 726 N.Y.S.2d 372, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 966 (N.Y. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that no motion for leave to appeal lies from the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division, from which the Court of Appeals previously dismissed appellant’s motion for leave to appeal (see, 95 NY2d 825), and a motion for leave to appeal from the subsequent judgment of Supreme Court, the proper appealable paper, is untimely (see, CPLR 5513).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that no motion for leave to appeal lies from the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division, from which the Court of Appeals previously dismissed appellant’s motion for leave to appeal (see, 95 NY2d 825), and a motion for leave to appeal from the subsequent judgment of Supreme Court, the proper appealable paper, is untimely (see, CPLR 5513).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 N.E.2d 74, 96 N.Y.2d 796, 726 N.Y.S.2d 372, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldman-copeland-associates-v-goodstein-bros-co-ny-2001.