Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

326 A.2d 688, 66 N.J. 7, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 128

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 22, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 326 A.2d 688 (Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 326 A.2d 688, 66 N.J. 7, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 128 (N.J. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.

Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N. J. Super. 307 (1974).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Sullivan and Pashman and Judge Conford — 5.

For reversal — Justices Hall and Clifford — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI