Goldking Onshore Operating, LLC and Goldking Holdings, LLC v. Leonard C. Tallerine, Jr., Goldking Energy Corporation, Goldking Energy Partners I, LP, Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC, Goldking Capital Management, LLC, Reta Wellwood D/B/A Vermillion Contracting Co., Denna Ramsey and Paul Culotta
This text of Goldking Onshore Operating, LLC and Goldking Holdings, LLC v. Leonard C. Tallerine, Jr., Goldking Energy Corporation, Goldking Energy Partners I, LP, Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC, Goldking Capital Management, LLC, Reta Wellwood D/B/A Vermillion Contracting Co., Denna Ramsey and Paul Culotta (Goldking Onshore Operating, LLC and Goldking Holdings, LLC v. Leonard C. Tallerine, Jr., Goldking Energy Corporation, Goldking Energy Partners I, LP, Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC, Goldking Capital Management, LLC, Reta Wellwood D/B/A Vermillion Contracting Co., Denna Ramsey and Paul Culotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion Granted and Order filed July 18, 2013
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00483-CV ____________
GOLDKING ONSHORE OPERATING, LLC AND GOLDKING HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellants
V.
LEONARD C. TALLERINE, JR., GOLDKING ENERGY CORPORATION, GOLDKING ENERGY PARTNERS I, LP, GOLDKING ENERGY PARTNERS II, LLC, GOLDKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, RETA WELLWOOD D/B/A VERMILLION CONTRACTING CO., DENNA RAMSEY AND PAUL CULOTTA, Appellees
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-08724
ORDER
On May 13, 2013, the trial court granted Counterclaim Defendants’1 and Third-Party Defendants’2 Joint Motion to Compel Arbitration and for Stay
1 Goldking Onshore Operating, LLC and Goldking Holdings, LLC. regarding counterclaims numbered one through nine. The trial court denied the motion as to number ten. Appellants filed a notice of appeal from the order’s denial as to number ten. Subsequently, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs (appellees) filed a cross-notice of appeal.
On June 14, 2013, appellants moved to dismiss the cross-appeal for want of jurisdiction. On June 29, 2013, a response was requested. No response was filed.
An order compelling arbitration is not subject to interlocutory appeal. See In re Gulf Exploration, L.L.C., 289 S.W.3d 836, 840 (Tex. 2009); Ortiz v. Junell Law Firm, 14-11-00805-CV, 2011 WL 5554620 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 15, 2011, pet. denied) (mem. op). Accordingly, we grant appellants’ motion and order the cross-appeal dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Busby.
2 Wayzata Opportunities Fund II, LP, Wayzata Investment Partners, LP, Pat Halloran, Mary Burns, Blake Carlson, Michael Strain, Raphael Wallander, and Edward Hebert.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Goldking Onshore Operating, LLC and Goldking Holdings, LLC v. Leonard C. Tallerine, Jr., Goldking Energy Corporation, Goldking Energy Partners I, LP, Goldking Energy Partners II, LLC, Goldking Capital Management, LLC, Reta Wellwood D/B/A Vermillion Contracting Co., Denna Ramsey and Paul Culotta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldking-onshore-operating-llc-and-goldking-holdings-llc-v-leonard-c-texapp-2013.