Home/U.S. Customs Court/Goldkamp v. United States

Goldkamp v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 369, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 806
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1954
DocketNo. 58407; protests 153520-K, 154491-K, and 155884-K (St. Louis)
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 369 (Goldkamp v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldkamp v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 369, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 806 (cusc 1954).

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the toilet paper in rolls the subject of Douglas Paper Co. v. United States (30 Cust. Ct. 87, C. D. 1501), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas Paper Co. v. United States
30 Cust. Ct. 87 (U.S. Customs Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Cust. Ct. 369, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldkamp-v-united-states-cusc-1954.