Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1517
CHRISTINE A. GOLDING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Christianburg, VA; MARK PASIER; MICHAEL STANLEY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00036-jct)
Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christine A. Golding, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Swann, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Christine A. Golding appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Golding v. Montgomery Cnty. Pub. Sch., No.
7:09-cv-00036-jct (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools (Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.