Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2010·No. 10-1517·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1517

CHRISTINE A. GOLDING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Christianburg, VA; MARK PASIER; MICHAEL STANLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00036-jct)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christine A. Golding, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Swann, GUYNN, MEMMER & DILLON, PC, Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christine A. Golding appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Golding v. Montgomery Cnty. Pub. Sch., No.

7:09-cv-00036-jct (W.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2010). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools, (4th Cir. 2010).

Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools (Golding v. Montgomery County Public Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related