Golding v. Mauss

35 A.D.2d 517, 314 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161

This text of 35 A.D.2d 517 (Golding v. Mauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golding v. Mauss, 35 A.D.2d 517, 314 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

Concur — Eager, MeGivern and Steuer, JJ.; Stevens, P. J., and Tilzer, J., dissent and would affirm on the ground that there was sufficient, prima facie, to warrant a submission to the jury and its verdict should not be disturbed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.D.2d 517, 314 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golding-v-mauss-nyappdiv-1970.