Golding v. Mauss
This text of 261 N.E.2d 399 (Golding v. Mauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, without costs, for reasons stated in dissenting opinion at Appellate Division, and case remitted to Appellate [582]*582Division for consideration of questions of fact, if any, raised on appeal to that court (CPLR 5612, subd. [a], 5613).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel and Gibson. Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Jasen dissent and vote to affirm on prevailing opinion at the Appellate Division.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 N.E.2d 399, 27 N.Y.2d 580, 313 N.Y.S.2d 399, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golding-v-mauss-ny-1970.