Golding v. City of New York
This text of 76 N.Y.S. 1020 (Golding v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question presented on this appeal is precisely like the question presented on the appeal from the order fixing the compensation of Charles Frederick Hoffman, Jr., decided herewith. 76 N. Y. Supp. 137. The conclusion there reached necessitates a reversal of the order here appealed from, and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case. The order appealed from, therefore, must be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with $10 costs, without prejudice, however, to the right of the respondent to renew his application, if he be so advised, upon competent proof as to the value of the services rendered. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 N.Y.S. 1020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golding-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1902.