Golding Bros. v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 239, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 761
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Golding Bros. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Cust. Ct. 217
United States Customs Court·Decided November 12, 1948·No. No. 52676; petition 6673-R (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

From the testimony it appeared that this was one of a series of test cases which were the subject of previous petitions before this court, all of which have been decided in favor of the petitioner (Abstracts 51047, 51672, and 51860). The importer, after filing an appeal for reappraisement, investigated market conditions in the country of exportation to determine the proper dutiable value of the merchandise. Thereafter, the importer entered into a stipulation with the Government to the effect that the United States value was the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that the appraised value was the proper dutiable value. On the record presented it was held that entry of this merchandise was made without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golding Bros. v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 239, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 761 (cusc 1948).

21 Cust. Ct. 239 (Golding Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.