Goldhirsch v. New York City Department of Transportation

New York Supreme Court

Goldhirsch v. New York City Department of Transportation

112 Misc. 2d 849, 447 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3203

DecidedFebruary 9, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 112 Misc. 2d 849 (Goldhirsch v. New York City Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldhirsch v. New York City Department of Transportation, 112 Misc. 2d 849, 447 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3203 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard Lee Price, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner seeks to challenge a determination of respondent Parking Violations Bureau (PVB) because the infraction of the parking rules occurred on a Sunday. Petitioner urges that no “parking tickets” should be given on Sundays because service of civil process cannot be made on that day (General Business Law, § 11). However, section 11 of the General Business Law also states that process may be served “in criminal proceedings or where service or execution is specially authorized by statute.” Parking violations, and traffic infractions in general, have always been quasi-criminal in nature. Until 1970, they were adjudicated in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, and no one at that time could argue that a “traffic ticket” or “summons” did not fit into the clear exception of section 11 of the General Business Law.

In 1969, the law (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 155) was amended so as to create the PVB as an administrative agency, and to transfer the authority to hear such matters from the Criminal Court to the PVB, in order to relieve congestion in the Criminal Court. It was not the intent of [850]*850the Legislature to change the nature of the parking violation but merely to change its place of hearing (Matter of Voccola v Shilling, 88 Misc 2d 103).

It is the opinion of this court that a notice of violation for illegal parking may be served on a Sunday.

Accordingly, the application is denied and the petitioner is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard Lee Price, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner seeks to challenge a determination of respondent Parking Violations Bureau (PVB) because the infraction of the parking rules occurred on a Sunday. Petitioner urges that no “parking tickets” should be given on Sundays because service of civil process cannot be made on that day (General Business Law, § 11). However, section 11 of the General Business Law also states that process may be served “in criminal proceedings or where service or execution is specially authorized by statute.” Parking violations, and traffic infractions in general, have always been quasi-criminal in nature. Until 1970, they were adjudicated in the Criminal Court of the City of New York, and no one at that time could argue that a “traffic ticket” or “summons” did not fit into the clear exception of section 11 of the General Business Law.

In 1969, the law (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 155) was amended so as to create the PVB as an administrative agency, and to transfer the authority to hear such matters from the Criminal Court to the PVB, in order to relieve congestion in the Criminal Court. It was not the intent of [850]*850the Legislature to change the nature of the parking violation but merely to change its place of hearing (Matter of Voccola v Shilling, 88 Misc 2d 103).

It is the opinion of this court that a notice of violation for illegal parking may be served on a Sunday.

Accordingly, the application is denied and the petitioner is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 Misc. 2d 849, 447 N.Y.S.2d 634, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldhirsch-v-new-york-city-department-of-transportation-nysupct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack