Goldflam v. Orns
This text of 84 A.D.2d 574 (Goldflam v. Orns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for malicious prosecution, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), entered January 11, 1980, which dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The complaint fails to state a cause of action (see Belsky v Lowenthal, 62 AD2d 319, affd 47 NY2d 820). Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.2d 574, 446 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15662, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldflam-v-orns-nyappdiv-1981.