Goldfish v. . Goldfish
130 N.E. 912, 230 N.Y. 606, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 884
This text of 130 N.E. 912 (Goldfish v. . Goldfish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldfish v. . Goldfish, 130 N.E. 912, 230 N.Y. 606, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 884 (N.Y. 1921).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re the Estate of Chilson
54 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
In re the Estate of Fredenthal
25 Misc. 2d 1068 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Estate of Bernstein
25 Misc. 2d 717 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
Prouty v. Drake
208 Misc. 540 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
In re the Accounting of Van Arsdale
190 Misc. 968 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 N.E. 912, 230 N.Y. 606, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldfish-v-goldfish-ny-1921.