Goldfish v. . Goldfish
130 N.E. 912, 230 N.Y. 606, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 884
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldfish v. . Goldfish, 130 N.E. 912, 230 N.Y. 606, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 884 (N.Y. 1921).
130 N.E. 912 (Goldfish v. . Goldfish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Chilson
54 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1966)
In re the Estate of Fredenthal
25 Misc. 2d 1068 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
In re the Estate of Bernstein
25 Misc. 2d 717 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1960)
Prouty v. Drake
208 Misc. 540 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
In re the Accounting of Van Arsdale
190 Misc. 968 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)