Goldfine v. Securities & Exchange Commission

157 F.2d 899, 5 SEC Jud. Dec. 15, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3787, 1946 WL 62876
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided October 29, 1946·No. No. 4138·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition under § 24(a) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, 49 Stat. 803, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79x(a), seeking review of an order of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued October 11, 1945, approving a certain plan of reorganization submitted by New England Public Service 'Company under § 11(e) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 79k(e). For the background, see our opinion in Harry C. Blatchley, Petitioner, 157 F.2d 894. Motions to dismiss have been filed by the Commission and by New England Public Service Company, Intervenor, on the ground that this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The motions to dismiss must be granted upon the authority of Okin v. Securities & Exchange Com., 2 Cir., 1944, 145 F.2d 206, and Lownsbury v. Securities & Exchange Com., 3 Cir., 1945, 151 F.2d 217.

The petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldfine v. Securities & Exchange Commission, 157 F.2d 899, 5 SEC Jud. Dec. 15, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3787, 1946 WL 62876 (1st Cir. 1946).

157 F.2d 899 (Goldfine v. Securities & Exchange Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downing v. Securities and Exchange Commission
203 F.2d 611 (D.C. Circuit, 1953)
Kuchman v. Commissioner
18 T.C. 154 (U.S. Tax Court, 1952)
In re Blatchley
157 F.2d 894 (First Circuit, 1946)