Goldfeder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Goldfeder v. State

346 So. 2d 114, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15940

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 1977

DocketNo. 76-1024

StatusPublished

This text of 346 So. 2d 114 (Goldfeder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldfeder v. State, 346 So. 2d 114, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15940 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment of conviction based upon a finding by the trial judge, in a. non jury trial, that appellant was guilty of resisting arrest with violence.

The sole question on appeal is whether there was sufficient competent evidence adduced to support the conviction of resisting arrest with violence.

We have carefully considered the point on appeal in the light of the record on appeal and briefs of counsel and have concluded that there was sufficient competent [115]*115evidence adduced to support the conviction of resisting arrest. Heineman v. State, 327 So.2d 898 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). No harmful error having been shown, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI